Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Nobel Prize Drug Scandal

Full Story

Is Nothing Sacred? Nobel Prize Engulfed in Drug Company Scandal

Welcome to today’s heaping dose of cynicism, to start off the weekend right: Scandal has hit none other than the Nobel Prize, after it was revealed that a member of the Nobel selection committee also sat on the board of AstraZeneca, a pharmaceuticals juggernaut that will benefit from this year’s award for medicine.

The 2008 Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine went to three people this year, Luc Montagnier and his (ahem, female) partner Fran├žoise Barre-Sinoussi for discovering HIV, and Harald zur Hausen for his work on the human papilloma virus (HPV) and its link to cervical cancer.

Wouldn’t you know it, AstraZeneca just happens to have a big fat stake in two lucrative HPV vaccines.

To make matters worse:

Two senior figures in the process that chose Mr. zur Hausen have strong links with the pharmaceutical company, which has also recently begun sponsoring the Nobel website and promotional subsidiary. The company strongly denies any wrongdoing.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Emergency response: America's freedom fighters are called to action

Summit Call
Saturday, December 20, 2008
by Robert L. Schulz

In our article of December 5, 2008, we asked, "What must a free people do, and what is the appropriate next step, if Mr. Obama refuses to respond to our Open Letter and the Supreme Court refuses to hear the Petitions by attorneys Donofrio, Berg, and Taitz challenging Obama's citizenship status?"

A violation of the "natural born citizen" clause of the Constitution by Mr. Obama is so egregious and blatant in its nature that it marks the overt and wholesale abandonment of the Constitution by the Government, making this our "capstone grievance," capping even the other abusive Constitutional violations this Foundation has sought to correct.

Since 1995, we have repeatedly and respectfully Petitioned the Government for Redress of its violations. We have established an overwhelming and irrefutable historic record of numerous, continuing violations by the Government and its steadfast refusal to justify its behavior or be held accountable in any way. For instance:

In light of the war powers clauses of the Constitution we have an individual Right to a government that does not apply the armed forces of the United States in hostilities overseas without a declaration of war; the invasion of Iraq was unconstitutional.

In light of the money clauses of the constitution the Federal Reserve System is unconstitutional.

We, the people have not authorized the government to give or lend public money or credit to private corporations for definitively private purposes. The Treasury and Fed bailouts are unconstitutional.

We, the people have not authorized the government to create a North American union that would, for all intents and purposes, erase our northern and southern borders. The development of a North American Union is unconstitutional.

In light of the privacy clauses of the constitution, the USA PATRIOT Act is unconstitutional, and the developing police state is unconstitutional.

In light of the tax clauses of the constitution, the direct, unapportioned tax on labor is unconstitutional.

In light of the Second Amendment, federal gun control laws are unconstitutional.

In light of the Second Amendment, the absence of well-regulated state militias is unconstitutional.

In light of the "faithfully execute" clause of the Constitution, the President's failure to faithfully execute the immigration and naturalization laws is unconstitutional.

In light of the "natural born citizen" clause of the Constitution, it is unconstitutional for Mr. Obama to assume the office of President of the United States, no matter the number of people who voted for him.

In light of the spirit and intent of the Constitution, it is unconstitutional for the Government to conduct elections that do not rely on paper ballots that are hand-marked and hand-counted with results announced and posted at each polling place.

In light of the First Amendment, Government officials are obligated to respond to the People's Petitions for Redress of Grievances and violations of the Constitution.

When a long train of abuses, usurpations, and refusals to respond to Petitions for Redress of violations of the Constitution evinces a conspiracy to transition our Constitutional Republic to a pure democracy, or to otherwise strip us of our Liberties and reduce us to serfdom under absolute despotism, it is the right of the People to alter the Government, proactively, non-violently, and with critical mass.

Since 1995, we have repeatedly and respectfully Petitioned the Government for Redress of these violations of the Constitution. Our Petitions for Redress have been answered only by a conspiracy of silence and repeated injuries. The Government has refused to justify its behavior or be held accountable.

The record is so clear and unambiguous that it leaves no room for questioning it or grasping the full import of its consequences: The servants have taken over the house that our Creator built.

What must a Free People do? What must be deemed the appropriate next step? [Full story]


Friday, December 19, 2008

The emergency is here


Thursday, December 18, 2008

The emergency is here

The time to act is now

by Mark Yannone


Today's economic problems -- and many others before these -- can be traced back directly to what the government did in 1913 when it violated the Constitution. Since that year, Americans have been co-conspirators of their own undoing and enslavement. We have had ample opportunities to correct this, and we always chose not to. Even now, this very instant, we refuse to save ourselves. Worse, we are committing a very sloppy suicide.

Could it be true? Are Americans too stupid to live?

On the off chance that a few brave Americans will take control before the train leaves the tracks and sails over the cliff, I offer this prescription.

1. End the income tax immediately. Tomorrow morning may be too late.

2. Replace ink-backed currency with asset-backed currencies, and close the Federal Reserve.

3. Release all political prisoners (including those with tax, drug, and prostitution cases).

4. Exit Iraq and Afghanistan before breakfast. We have no business there.

5. Recall the military from around the world. Remember, we can't afford ANY government at the moment.

6. Close all unconstitutional federal operations.

7. Sell the schools to the highest bidders, return the proceeds to the rightful owners, and discontinue all taxation and government involvement in education.

8. Bear in mind that you own yourself and all that you call yours. Don't forget it again.

9. Take every negative thought you have and bury it. You can't afford them either. You are out of choices and out of time.

10. Solve the remaining problems without distraction and without causing injury. The lessons of aggression and fraud are all around us, and they are perfectly clear to those who care to look.


Sunday, December 14, 2008

Canaries Dropped from Skies, Drinking Water

Full Story

The Canaries Dropped from the Skies
For two years, the transport of mined lead into a seaside Australian community was an unrecognized source of contamination. Then thousands of birds began to drop dead out of the sky.

Scientists discovered lethal amounts of lead in the dead birds. These birds were killed by drinking water that had been contaminated by lead carbonate. Lead carbonate is much more toxic than other forms of lead; it easily infiltrates the lungs and is rapidly absorbed by the blood. It was also the type of lead found in the local Australian mine.

The researchers went on to discover massive contamination of the local populace through breathing in lead carbonate dust; the contamination was also in the soil that grew their vegetables and in their drinking water. Lead carbonate from the mine comprised between 30 and 93% of the total blood lead content in children younger than 6. The effects of lead toxicity include neurological, cardiovascular, and reproductive damage. In addition, lead has been linked to high blood pressure.



by Tim Wood
2008 December 1
Full story

I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied history all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten - fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two years. We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learn just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money, yours and mine. And that is three times the 700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not, they now control us.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Crazy Books, Dead Parrots and Paul's Logic

Warning: Books and dead parrots are bad for your health

by Craig J. Cantoni

"Thinking of reading a book? Thinking of giving someone a book for Christmas? Thinking of encouraging your children to read books?


Books are bad for one's mental health, especially if the books are on economics, history, and philosophy. I know, because I'm a raving lunatic from reading such books for most of my life.

To clarify, not all books on economics, history, and philosophy will make you crazy. For example, in my early twenties..."

A columnist and author of two books, Mr. Cantoni can be reached at ccan2@aol.com.


Ron Paul: Printing Money only Prolongs the Pain


See the video at the bottom of the above linked article. This is an example of Dr. Paul's educated "common sense" that can only be met with opposition from people who do not want to improve our country's, and thereby, our individual situations. People mired in laziness and ignorance along with those drugged from power, greed, or ego can perhaps hear, but will never listen.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Fraudulent Reports on HIV

Semmelweis Endorses Scientists' Call for Science to RETRACT Fraudulent Reports on HIV


Washington DC, Dec 9 – Nearly 25 years after the publication of four foundational articles on HIV and AIDS, prominent scientists, physicians and legal experts are now asking for their removal from the journal Science.

Their request is based upon new evidence that Dr. Robert Gallo - the former National Cancer Institute (NCI) researcher who declared he had found the probable cause of AIDS - had actually based his claims on his own unverified last-minute alterations to lab reports and experiments.

The letter's 37 signatories include medical doctors, chemists, oncologists, university professors, virologists, researchers, pathologists, AND biologists.

After fellow researcher Matthew Gonda PhD informed Gallo that his electron microscopy showed no evidence of a virus in 1984, Gallo used Gonda's name and photographs to corroborate his claim that he had isolated the virus. Because the majority of all subsequent AIDS research is predicated on the assumption that Gallo's research was legitimate, the ramification of these findings of fraud raises serious questions regarding past and current US policy toward AIDS research.

It now appears that Gallo never produced any evidence or proof that HIV attacks cells or causes AIDS. As a result of his unchallenged claims, Gallo was officially declared one of two co-discoverers of the HIV in 1984.

Gallo left NCI after the Dept's of Health's Office of Research Integrity (ORI) accused him of committing scientific misconduct (1992). Although the evidence against him was considerable a legal technicality prevented criminal charges from being filed.

Gallo shares a patent for HIV tests that generates millions of dollars in annual revenue, although the tests do not detect the presence of the virus itself or any unique or specific components of HIV. No HIV test manufacturer has ever claimed that their tests detect HIV or AIDS.

The new findings were first admitted into evidence during a Congressional investigation (Dingell-1993) that focused on questions related to Gallo's alleged theft of cell culture samples. Those hearings never examined the actual fabrication of research.

The ORI reported that Gallo's "irresponsible laboratory management has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken." Not only did Gallo's conduct prevent fellow scientists from verifying his research, but Gallo distributed research materials with the express stipulation that his experiments not be repeated.

Semmelweis Society International (SSI) has determined that the new evidence does not conflict with the findings of it's own investigation which was initiated after a former medical student raised questions about AIDS in Africa.

For additional information, contact Clark Baker (clark@semmelweis.org) or visit www.semmelweis.org.

(Semmelweis Society International, Inc., is a registered 501c3 non-profit corporation. Comprised of physicians, nurses, attorneys and university professors, its primary mission is to promote patient safety by ending retaliation against scientists, physicians, and nurses who report dangerous conditions, fraud, and corruption within hospitals and the US healthcare industry.)


Please see more info at http://www.thereikimatrix.com/HIVAIDS/index.htm

AIDS Social Worker Experiences Paradigm Shift

November 27th, 2008

Sarah Breidenbach was a highly regarded social worker who specialized in assisting people diagnosed HIV positive or with AIDS. For Sarah, this position was far more than a job, it was an opportunity to make a real difference in the lives of her clients, and she approached her work with great dedication and conviction. She felt very strongly that by encouraging compliance with AIDS drug treatments and discouraging skepticism about the causal link between HIV and AIDS she was offering HIV positives their best possible chances for staying alive. But after more than half a decade of a professional and personal life that revolved around AIDS from the mainstream perspective, Sarah very reluctantly agreed to watch the documentary film, The Other Side of AIDS, and something remarkable happened as a result: she began to question the basis for her staunchly held views, and ultimately the direction and meaning of her life’s work. Listen in as David and Christine speak with Sarah about her journey from certainty into the unknown, an experience she recounts with intelligence, grace and unusual honesty. News items include a Ugandan drug trial testing the idea of “reduced transmission” a proposed HIV prevention drug combo in the UK, and the criminalization of HIV in a growing number of countries.

The Other Side of AIDS
HIV=AIDS: Fact Or Fraud?
Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS

David's HIV/AIDS page on Reiki Matrix:

Help for HIV

Here are ten facts every person diagnosed as HIV-positive has a right to know
(click on the underlined words for quick references)...

  • 1. There is strong evidence that the HIV test you took is very often wrong. We have found over fifty different scientific studies listing seventy non-HIV conditions that can make the test produce false positive results. Depending on which test you took, they can actually be wrong as much as 90% of the time. So you might not be HIV-positive at all.
  • 2. The HIV test you took was not a test for AIDS, or even a test for HIV. Despite what we've all been told, it was a simple test to find certain antibodies in your blood -- an "HIV-antibody" test. But viral antibodies alone do not indicate a current infection. In fact, in virtually every other antibody test, to be positive for the antibodies means that you had exposure to or a prior virus infection and are now immune from the disease that virus could cause. Antibody protection is the basis for the practice of vaccinations, like gaining immunity against the flu with a flu shot. There are no studies that show why we should think any differently about antibodies to HIV. A growing number of experts now believe that testing HIV-antibody-positive actually means that you have successfully created what your body needs to defeat any HIV infection.
  • 3. The HIV test you took has never been "validated," as was normally done in the past. That means that there has never been a group of people who tested HIV-positive who were then proven to have active HIV (not just the antibodies) in their blood. Conversely, there has also never been a group who tested HIV-negative and were proven not to have active HIV in their blood. This lack of test validation raises serious questions about the validity of your positive diagnosis.
  • 4. The proteins used in the HIV test kits have never been proven to be unique or specific for HIV. In fact, every one of the proteins used in the test has been found to be associated with conditions that have nothing to do with HIV -- and many of these proteins have nothing to do with illness of any kind. In other words, scientific evidence cannot prove that a positive HIV test means that you have HIV or AIDS or any other health problem.

  • 5. No HIV test, whether it uses blood, urine or saliva, has ever been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the specific intended purpose of diagnosing infection with HIV.

  • In fact, there is a printed insert that comes in every HIV test kit which contains a disclaimer that the test cannot diagnose actual infection with HIV. Most doctors giving the test and most people taking the test never see these disclaimers

  • 6. Nineteen samples of the same blood were sent to nineteen different laboratories for a Western Blot test, and they all came back with different results. 525 samples of the same blood of an ELISA-Positive test were sent to 525 different laboratories for a Western Blot confirmation, and came back with very different results. One blood sample was sent to the same lab 44 times and came back with different results. This means that your tests results could have been different if they had been done in a different laboratory.
  • 7. There is no established standard for determining the results of your test. In fact, there are at least ten different ways to interpret your HIV test, and each one of those can give a different result. It often depends on where you live in the world, whose standards are used to interpret your test, and what information you give about your life and health history. You might be positive according to one set of standards, but negative using another. Some people have gone from being HIV-positive to being HIV-negative just by moving to a different location, or by changing laboratories or testing sites, or giving different information about their potential "risk factors."
  • 8. Many people believe that HIV viral load tests do what antibody tests cannot, by detecting the actual virus. But this is a false belief. According to the disclaimer statements on viral load tests, they are "not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or to confirm HIV infection." This is because the viral load tests have some of the same problems as the HIV blood tests: they have never been validated, the "probes" and "primers" they use have never been proven to be unique or specific to HIV, they are not standardized from laboratory to laboratory, they produce a high rate of false positives, and more. In fact, most laboratories will not allow you to take an HIV viral load test unless you have already tested HIV-positive, because people who are HIV-negative have had high HIV viral load results.

    In addition, the most recent scientific study shows that viral load measurements failed in 90% of the cases in predicting the loss of CD4 cells, which HIV is supposed to destroy. In fact, viral load tests were only able to predict "progression to disease" in 4% to 6% of the HIV-Positives studied. This study proves that there must be "nonvirological mechanisms as the predominant cause of CD4 cell loss." In other words, HIV cannot be the cause of immune deficiency and therefore a viral load test is a totally useless indicator of whether someone will get AIDS. An analysis of this study in the same issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that viral load results alone should not be used to begin antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

  • 9. A lot of emphasis is also placed on CD4 (or T-cell) counts to diagnose someone with AIDS. However, T-cell counts can fluctuate widely from day to day and hour to hour in even normal, healthy people. We've known since 1991 that "variance in CD4 from ...non-HIV related longitudinal fluctuations needs to be accounted for in analysis of the prognostic power of CD4 in HIV infection." And other studies have found perfectly healthy HIV-negative individuals with very low T-cell counts. And as recently as May 2007, from the Imperial College of London: "Our new interdisciplinary research has thrown serious doubt on one popular theory of how HIV affects these [CD4] cells."
  • 10. And despite what you hear from the mass media, there is no scientific study that proves that HIV is transmitted through heterosexual intercourse. In fact, the opposite is true. The longest and largest study of its kind (called the Padian study) found no transmission of HIV in any of the study couples, regardless of whether they were using condoms or not; and the most recent study from the British Medical Journal found no evidence that abstinence education would prevent HIV infection.

Even if the HIV tests were validated, approved for diagnosing actual HIV infection, and had a universal standard of interpretation, there is still no conclusive medical evidence that proves that testing positive is an indication that you are or will become sick. Despite everything you may have heard over the past twenty years, there is still no scientific study that proves that HIV causes AIDS or shows that it destroys the immune system. In fact, a review of the medical literature reveals that HIV fails every medical and scientific test to be called the cause of AIDS.

Because of these questions about the HIV tests, and HIV itself, you should carefully consider whether or not to take the drugs you will be pressured to take, called anti-retroviral drugs (or HAART). Recent scientific studies show that more people are dying from the side effects of these drugs than from illnesses associated with AIDS, and that the drugs being given today are even worse than the ones offered ten years ago.

These statements, and all the other information offered on this website, are not our opinions, but irrefutable facts. If you are told something different by your doctor or the mass media, we urge you to read the scientific studies for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

Although this information is rarely found in the mass media or in presentations by the AIDS establishment, it is supported by more than 2629 medical and scientific researchers, legal experts, doctors, chiropractors, PhD’s, journalists, health care providers, and other professionals – including two Nobel Prize winners in medicine and chemistry and members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

From an email received July 14, 2007...

Just an update that confirms everything on your website. I had FOUR rapid tests done within a week, two were negative and two were positive. I had TWO Western Blots done. One showed I was reactive on every band but one (HIV+) and the other showed I was reactive on only one band (HIV-indeterminate). For tests that are supposed to be over 99% accurate they just proved they only have a 50% accuracy. In fact, I took two rapids at the exact same time and one was negative and one was positive. What a scam.



Before you start (or continue) taking HIV drug treatments, please educate yourself about the facts and come to your own conclusions about what may be best for your own life and health. You can start by using the links to books, podcasts, videos, scientific papers, interviews, articles, blogs, websites, and support and discussion groups where you will find all the information you need to make up your own mind about how you will live with your positive diagnosis.

You need to know that there are thousands of people diagnosed HIV-positive who either stopped, or never started taking the HIV drugs and are living healthy and happy lives today, some of them for more than twenty years.

Is a healthy, happy life possible for you, too? It's up to you to decide. We invite you to explore the questions raised here by using the links on the left and hope that you will read, or listen to, and study what you find there. If you need additional information or help, please don’t hesitate to email us.

If you would like to give us your email address, we would be happy to keep you informed about any new scientific papers or articles that are published concerning the HIV test and the HIV drugs. (We do not give, sell, or in any other way divulge your email address to anyone else.)

We also invite you to email this website to friends, family, and even your doctor. We are available to answer any questions they may have or meet any challenges they may raise in the spirit of getting to the truth about HIV and AIDS.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

The Body Toxic

What In The World Are You Putting On Your Skin?


Is your bathroom cabinet bulging with toxins? Is your make-up or toiletries bag a cocktail of chemicals that could do you harm? Yes is probably the answer to both questions. Check out the ingredients list on your bottles and jars: the higher up the list these 15 come, the greater the concentration.

Formaldehyde - Combined with water, this toxic gas is used as a disinfectant, fixative, germicide and preservative in deodorants, liquid soaps, nail varnish and shampoos. Also known as formalin, formal and methyl aldehyde, it is a suspected human carcinogen and has caused lung cancer in rats. It can damage DNA, irritate the eyes, upper respiratory tract and mucous membrane, and may cause asthma and headaches. It is banned in Japan and Sweden.

Phthalates hit the headlines last year for being "gender benders". They are a family of industrial plasticisers already banned in the EU from being used in plastic toys, but are still in hairsprays, top-selling perfumes and nail varnishes. They can be absorbed through the skin, inhaled as fumes and ingested from contaminated food or breastfeeding. Animal studies have shown they can damage the liver, kidneys, lungs and reproductive system -especially developing testes.

Parabens are listed as alkyl parahydroxy benzoates -butyll methyl/ethyl/ propyllisobutyl paraben on some toothpastes, moisturisers and deodorants. They are used as a preservative, but are oestrogen mimics. Research suggests that parabens in antiperspirant deodorants can cause breast cancer. Oestrogen-type chemicals have also been linked to testicular cancer and a reduction in sperm count.

Sodium Lauryl Sulphate (SLS) is one of the major ingredients in nearly every shampoo, bubble bath, liquid soap etc. Why, when it is a known skin irritant, stops hair growth, can cause cataracts in adults, damage children's eye development and cause urinary tract infection?

Toluene is a common solvent found in nail enamels, hair gels, hair spray, and perfumes. It is a neurotoxin and can damage the liver, disrupt the endocrine system and cause asthma.

Propylene Glycol is a cosmetic form of mineral oil (refined crude oil) used in industrial antifreeze. People handling it are warned by the manufacturer to avoid skin contact and wear respirators and rubber gloves etc, and yet this is a major ingredient in most moisturisers, skin creams, baby wipes and sun screens. Why? It's cheap and gives the "glide" factor in body lotions - but is in fact robbing lower layers of skin of moisture. Lanolin and collagen also clog pores and cause skin to age faster than if nothing was used.

Talc is recognised as carcinogenic and has been linked to an increased risk of ovarian cancer and general urinary tract disorders. So don't dust it on your baby's, or anyone else's, bottom!

Parfum/perfume A typical cosmetic can contain up to 100 chemicals in the perfume alone! 95 per cent of these chemicals are synthetic compounds derived from petroleum -26 of which are on an EU hit list. Fragrances have been linked to allergies and breathing difficulties and they penetrate the skin.

Xylene is listed as xytol or dimethylbenzene on nail varnish bottles. It can damage your liver, is narcotic in high concentrations and causes skin and respiratory tract irritation.

Diethanolamine Also Tri and Mono (DEA, TEA and MEA) are absorbed through skin where they accumulate in products also containing nitrates, they react and form nitrosamines which are carcigonemic.

Aluminium is found in most deodorants and has been linked to Alzheimer's. If you want to stay alert, and still smell fresh and clean switch to a safer one.

Triclosan sometimes listed as 5-chloro-2 (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenol, is in deodorants, toothpastes, vaginal washes and mouthwashes. Toxic dioxins are produced during its manufacture or incineration. It is stored in breast milk and in fish, and can break down in water to create a member of the dioxin family.

For information on how to detox including a great detoxification program see The Food Matters Detox & Rejuvenation Guide

Watch this 10 minute clip to find out more about the harmful toxins in our environment and how they could be harming you or your loved ones.


Do you regularly use any of these products? If yes, your body may be loaded with harmful toxins. Detoxifying your body can vastly improve your health. For information on how to detox including a great detoxification program see The Food Matters Detox & Rejuvenation Guide

Source: http://www.canceractive.com/page.php?n=224

Tuesday, December 9, 2008



By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
December 8, 2008


Full story

As this commentary is being written, the latest runaround in the judicial flim-flam of “who lacks ‘standing’ to demand production of Barack Obama’s original Hawaiian birth certificate (if one actually exists)” has just taken place. According to a newspaper report, Hawaiian Judge Bert Ayabe has dismissed a suit filed by one Andy Martin, on the ground that Martin “does not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama.”

Perhaps one may gauge the circumspection and even-handedness with which Ayabe approached the case by recalling that Barack Obama is not yet “the President of the United States,” only the ostensible “President elect” once removed (because he has been purportedly “elected” only by the voters, but not yet by the Electoral College as certified by the President of the Senate under the Twelfth Amendment). And the underlying issue in Martin’s suit is whether Obama is even constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of President. So Ayabe’s decision exhibits a rather strong undercurrent of question-begging and special pleading.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Unintended GMO Health Risks

The following link is full of information you should know about the "food" that is called GMO

Unintended GMO Health Risks

Genetically modified foods:

YES, you are already eating them.
NO, they are not safe to eat.

Did you know... since 1996 Americans have been eating genetically modified (GM) ingredients in most processed foods.

Did you know... GM plants, such as soybean, corn, cottonseed, and canola have had foreign genes forced into their DNA. And the inserted genes come from species, such as bacteria and viruses, that have never been in the human food supply.

Did you know... genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are not safe. They have been linked to thousands of toxic and allergenic reactions, thousands of sick, sterile, and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ and system studied in lab animals.

Find out what the risks are and start protecting yourself and your family today!

Monsanto Documentary

The World According to Monsanto Documentary

part 1


part 2


part 3


part 4


part 5


part 6


part 7


part 8


Americans Duped Again (and again, and again, and...)


By Chuck Baldwin
December 5, 2008

Full story

"Change you can believe in." This was Barack Obama's campaign slogan. There is no doubt that the American people were fed up with George W. Bush and his fellow Republicans. Who can blame them?

After campaigning for "change" back in 1999 (What political challenger doesn't campaign for change?), President Bush and his fellow neocons promptly set out to continue business as usual in Washington, D.C. Federal spending and meddling exploded under the leadership of the GOP. In fact, one has to go back to the administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt to match the increases in Big Government and Big Brother by Bush and Company. Add to the out-of-control spending habits of the GOP an unnecessary war, a near-Depression economy, and a burgeoning police state. It is no surprise that the American people were ready for change. And Obama excelled in delivering the message of change. So, what kind of change will Obama actually deliver?

There will be no real change in Washington, D.C., until the CFR and their elitist cronies are thoroughly and universally removed from power. And the only way this will happen is if we elect an Independent President of the United States (someone who truly understands the New World Order and is dedicated to defeating it), because the two major parties will never allow someone opposed to the CFR to become their nominee. The only Republican candidate for President in 2008 who demonstrated those credentials was Dr. Ron Paul. And to a lesser degree, the only Democrat who even seemed to vaguely understand this was Dennis Kucinich. Notice that both men were thoroughly repudiated by their respective parties' leadership and all but totally ignored by the national news media. (The CFR and their surrogates also control the national news media. What a coincidence!)

So, while the occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue may have changed, there will be no real change to the direction of these United States. Count on it!

Friday, December 5, 2008

Divesting the FDA

Health Freedom News

SUMMARY: Divesting the FDA of Food Authority
Take Action


Read more:

It's been a year since an official Congressional study of the FDA said the FDA cannot fulfill its mission because

  • FDA's scientific base has been eroded
  • FDA's scientific organizational structure is weak
  • FDA's conflicts of interest with industry paying scientists for their opinions make objective science impossible
  • Read more: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=1482

The study found, in part, that the FDA is institutionally incapable of protecting the food supply. Nor, we believe, does it want to.

What's the natural solution? To protect ourselves and our foods (that is, our health) we must divest the FDA of food authority, just like the FDA was divested of authority over controlled dangerous substances a couple decades ago when the DEA was established. And we must do it now. For more see: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=1482

You know, of course, FDA is "down regulating" foods, including dietary supplements and natural remedies, while supporting dangerous drugs. How dangerous? Take a look at what the CDC, a unit of the FDA, published on this topic in 2007. Note that these statistics only go as far as 2004. Numerous separate studies show that the rate has increased dramatically since then.

The solution is clear because the situation is intolerable. Maybe it made sense to combine these functions when the agency was created early in the 20th century because most drugs were derived from foods. It no longer makes sense and the time to end this deadly conflict of OUR interests in now.

Click here (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26314) to let your Congressional legislators know that you want them to support divesting the FDA of its food regulatory responsibilities. And let your contacts know that this is an important issue for you which you hope will be for them, too, by forwarding this email with a brief cover note urging them to get involved and sign up for the free, secure, Health Freedom Action eAlerts (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187).

Read more at: Divesting the FDA - Action Item


Click here to make your tax deductible recurring donation: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189

The most dangerous video, G. Edward Griffin and Unfiltered News

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Why you feel depressed, and what you can do about it
by Mark Yannone

With great pleasure, I once again bring you Stefan Molyneux, whose 16-minute and four-second video is probably the most dangerous video on the Internet. It speaks for itself.

Stefan Molyneux on the illusion of freedom;

The most dangerous video on the Internet

To those with desire to learn and improve....

The following is only one of many by G. Edward Griffin offering educated incite put in words anyone can comprehend. The videos with this man (many available to view on "YouTube") are truly educational beyond anything I could add here. Invest in your knowledge and understanding of some truth, also here; (freedomforceinternational.org). Your return on that "investment" can only be improvement, individually (and hopefully) collectively.

G. Edward Griffin- On Individualism v Collectivism #1

more video here

Unfiltered News here;

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Doctors Abandoning Vaccines

Factors That Discourage Vaccine Making


"Recent vaccine shortages are not coincidental, nor do they represent short-lived, easily fixable problems in the vaccine industry. Rather, several market forces explain why pharmaceutical companies are gradually abandoning vaccines."


Scarce Economic Resources Lead Irish Government To Abandon HPV Vaccination Plan

07 Nov 2008
Full story

"The Irish government on Tuesday announced that "very scarce" health resources have led it to abandon a plan to vaccinate all 12-year-old girls in the republic against human papillomavirus, some strains of which can lead to cervical cancer, the Irish Times reports."



Full story

"Vaccine injuries can have both civil and criminal ramifications. This paper explores civil management of vaccine injury for victims seeking compensation through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and discusses the potentially devastating consequences that can befall a family when injuries caused by vaccines are mistakenly attributed to physical abuse inflicted by a caretaker ..."

Congressman Ron Paul Warns Of Secret Plans To Create International Central Bank

Congressman Ron Paul Warns Of Secret Plans To Create International Central Bank

Steve Watson
Friday, Nov 28, 2008
Full story

Texas Congressman Ron Paul has warned that international forces are planning the creation of a global central bank that will see a new fiat monetary system come to dominate the world economy.

The 2008 presidential candidate also warned that Barack Obama’s administration will only represent a change in faces and not in policies.

Speaking about the recent G20 meeting Paul told Russia Today:

“I think something will come of it but you probably didn’t hear about it yet. There was some pomp and ceremony that the public knew about, but behind the scenes they were talking about the future and what they are going to do to try to internationalize all regulations, going in the opposite direction of free market and more towards international regulations. I’m sure they even talked about an international central bank.”

Watch the entire interview here.

Monday, December 1, 2008

lie, cheat, steal, but we are "good"

Gee, where do you think the "reality" for life is coming from?
Could it be a lawless governmental president or congress?
Maybe, the people that are afraid say enough is enough....

"In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy." Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438

Students lie, cheat, steal, but say they're good

Full story

NEW YORK – In the past year, 30 percent of U.S. high school students have stolen from a store and 64 percent have cheated on a test, according to a new, large-scale survey suggesting that Americans are too apathetic about ethical standards.

Educators reacting to the findings questioned any suggestion that today's young people are less honest than previous generations, but several agreed that intensified pressures are prompting many students to cut corners.

Lawmakers to seek ban on BPA

Lawmakers to seek ban on BPA

Analysis of chemical leaching from food containers gets action in Washington, Madison

BPA, used to make baby bottles and the lining of metal food cans, including those containing infant formula, is tied to reproductive failures, breast cancer risk, diabetes and heart disease. A study last month found that it interferes with chemotherapy for breast cancer patients.

Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration declared BPA to be safe. But it reopened its examination after a subcommittee of an advisory board found that the agency had ignored valuable studies.

Markey held up the Journal Sentinel results to bolster his criticism of the FDA.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Open Letter to Obama from We the People

Open Letter to Obama from We the People

by Robert L. Schulz


Are you a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S. ?

Are you legally eligible to hold the Office of President?

Dear Mr. Obama:

Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the Constitution.

Compelling evidence supports the claim that you are barred from holding the Office of President by the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution. For instance:

• You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged, and thoroughly discredited, computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a form that lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of attending physician, and age of mother.

• Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were born in Hawaii.

• Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya.

• Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birth in Kenya.

• U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child born in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19 years of age.

• In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S. citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming a naturalized Indonesian citizen.

You have repeatedly refused to provide evidence of your eligibility when challenged to do so in a number of recent lawsuits. Instead, you have been successful in having judges declare that they are powerless to order you to prove your eligibility to assume the Office of President.

Incredibly, the judge in Hawaii actually said it would be an invasion of your privacy for him to order access to your original birth certificate in order to prove your eligibility to hold the Office of President.

Before you can legitimately exercise any of the powers of the President you must meet all the criteria for eligibility established by the Constitution. You are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence. Should you assume the office as anyone but a bona fide natural born citizen of the United States who has not relinquished that citizenship, you would be inviting a national crisis that would undermine the domestic peace and stability of the Nation. For example:

• You would always be viewed by many Americans as a poseur - a usurper.

• As a usurper , you would be unable to take the required "Oath or Affirmation" on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible you cannot faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States.

• You would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience, or support from the People.

• The Armed Forces would be under no legal obligation to remain obedient to you.

• No civilian in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any of your proclamations, Executive Orders, or directives, as such orders would be legally void.

• Your appointments of Judges to the Supreme Court would be void.

• Congress would not be able to pass any needed legislation because it would not be able to acquire the signature of a bona fide President.

• Congress would be unable to remove you, a usurper, from the Office of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos including a potential for armed conflicts within the General Government or among the States and the People to effect the removal of such a usurper.

In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility, I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a Redress of this violation of the Constitution.

With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, December 5, 6, and 7, 2008.

In addition, I ask that you deliver the following documentary evidence to the National Press Club in Washington DC by 10 a.m. on December 8, 2008, marked for my attention:

• A certified copy of your original, signed "vault" birth certificate.

• Certified copies of your reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham, and Barry Dunham.

• A certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship.

• A certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity.

• Certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School.

• Certified copies of any legal documents changing your name.

Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the Constitution’s eligibility requirements.

All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility, they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.

"In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy." Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this urgent matter.


Robert L. Schulz



See also:

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

J. Krisnamurti and UK politician Marvin Rees

a good quote or two.......

"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society"

J. Krishnamurti


"On the one day when decision-makers are held to account for why they didn't listen to what you had to say, never let it be said that you chose to be silent. Always force someone to ignore you, don't allow them that convenient option of not listening to your voice."

UK politician Marvin Rees

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Bailout Bill votes

In case you wanted to know where the bottomless pit of YOUR money is going, You might want to ask one of these fine folks. My suggestion is to vote OUT of office the traitors that sold out your savings and future. Make them JOBLESS and feel what it is like to have someone else take away their money... Perhaps, we could give their salaries to the wealthy.
This post deals with my state, you could find the traitors of your state here.

U.S. Congress, with local office addresses and Billionaire's Bailout Bill votes

House of Representatives

Louie Gohmert
1121 ESE Loop 323 Suite 206 Tyler, TX 75701
Ph: 903-561-6349
Fax: 903-561-7110
DC Ph: 202-225-3035
DC Fax: 202-225-5866
Voted against bailout both times
Ted Poe
20202 US Highway 59 North Suite 105 Humble, TX 77338
Ph: (281) 446-0242
Fax: (281) 446-0252
DC Ph: 866-425-6565
DC Fax: 202-225-5547
Voted against bailout both times
Sam Johnson
3102 Maple Avenue Suite 600 Dallas, TX 75201
Ph: (214) 922-8885
Fax: (214) 922-7028
DC Ph: 202-225-4201
DC Fax: 202-225-1485
Voted against bailout both times
Ralph Hall
104 N. San Jacinto St.Rockwall, TX 75087-2508
Ph: 972-771-9118
Fax: 972-722-0907
DC Ph: 202-225-6673
DC Fax: 202-225-3332
Voted against bailout both times
Jeb Hensarling
6510 Abrams Road, Suite 243 Dallas, TX 75231
Ph: (214) 349-9996
DC Ph: 202-225-3484
DC Fax: 202-226-4888
Voted against bailout both times
Joe Barton
6001 West Ronald Reagan Memorial Highway, Suite 200, Arlington, Texas 76017
Ph: (817) 543-1000
Fax: (817) 548-7029
DC Ph: 202-225-2002
DC Fax: 202-225-3052
Voted against bailout both times
John Culberson
10000 Memorial Drive Suite 620 Houston, TX 77024-3490
Ph: 713) 682-8828
Fax: (713) 680-8070
DC Ph: 202-225-2571
DC Fax: 202-225-4381
Voted against bailout both times
Kevin Brady
200 River Pointe, Suite 304, Conroe, Texas 77304
Ph: (936) 441-5700
Fax: (936) 441-5757
DC Ph: 202-225-4901
DC Fax: 202-225-5524
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Al Green
3003 South Loop West Suite 460 Houston, TX 77054
Ph: (713) 383-9234
Fax: (713) 383-9202
DC Ph: 202-225-7508
DC Fax: 202-225-2947
Turncoat: voted for bigger bailout
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Michael McCaul
5929 Balcones Dr. Suite 305 Austin, TX 78731
Ph: 512-473-2357
Fax: 512-473-0514
DC Ph: 202-225-2401
DC Fax: 202-225-5955
Voted against bailout both times
Mike Conaway
411 W. 8th Street, 5th Floor Odessa, TX 79761
Ph: (432) 331-9667
Fax: (432) 332-6538
DC Ph: 202-225-3605
DC Fax: 202-225-1783
Turncoat: voted for bigger bailout
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Kay Granger
Ph: 817-338-0909
Fax: 817-335-5852
DC Ph: 202-225-5071
DC Fax: 202-225-5683
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Mac Thornberry
905 South Fillmore Street Suite 520 Amarillo, TX 79101
Ph: 806-371-8844
Fax: 806-371-7044
DC Ph: 202-225-3706
DC Fax: 202-225-3486
Turncoat: voted for bigger bailout
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Ron Paul

DC Ph: 202-225-2831
DC Fax:
Voted against bailout both times
Ruben Hinojosa
2864 West Trenton Road Edinburg, TX 78539
Ph: (956) 682-5545
Fax: (956) 682-0141
DC Ph: 202-225-2531
DC Fax: 202-225-5688
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Silvestre Reyes
310 N. Mesa, Suite 400 El Paso, Texas 79901
Ph: (915) 534-4400
Fax: (915) 534-7426
DC Ph: 202-225-4831
DC Fax: 202-225-2016
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Chet Edwards
St. Charles Place, 600 Austin Avenue, Suite 29, Waco, Texas 76701
Ph: (254) 752-9600
Fax: (254) 752-7769
DC Ph: 202-225-6105
DC Fax: 202-225-0350
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Sheila Jackson-Lee
2929 N. Central Expy, Ste 240 Richardson, Texas 75080
Ph: (972)470-0892
DC Ph: 202-225-3816
DC Fax: 202-225-3317
Turncoat: voted for bigger bailout
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Randy Neugebauer
500 Chestnut St. Suite #819 Abilene, TX 79602
Ph: (325) 675-9779
Fax: (325) 675-5038
DC Ph: 202-225-4005
DC Fax: 202-225-9615
Voted against bailout both times
Charlie Gonzalez
B-124 Federal Building 727 East Durango San Antonio, TX 78206-1286
Ph: (210) 472-6195
Fax: (210) 472-4009
DC Ph: 202-225-3236
DC Fax: 202-225-1915
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Lamar Smith
3536 Bee Cave Road, Suite 212 Austin, TX 78746
Ph: 512-306-0439
Fax: 512-306-0427
DC Ph: 202-225-4236
DC Fax: 202-225-8628
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Nick Lampson
1919 Smith Street Suite 1180 Houston, Texas 77002
Ph: (713) 655-0050
Fax: (713) 655-1612
DC Ph: 202.225.5951
DC Fax: 202.225.5241
Voted against bailout both times
Ciro D. Rodriguez
1950 S.W. Military Drive San Antonio, TX 78221
Ph: (210) 922-1874
Fax: (210) 923-8447
DC Ph: (202) 225-4511
DC Fax:
Voted against bailout both times
Kenny Marchant
9901 East Valley Ranch Parkway Suite 3035 Irving, TX 75063
Ph: 972-556-0162
Fax: 972-409-9704
DC Ph: 202-225-6605
DC Fax: 202-225-0074
Voted against bailout both times
Lloyd Doggett
300 East 8th St., #763 Federal Building Austin, TX 78701
Ph: 512-916-5921
DC Ph: 202-225-4865
DC Fax: 202-225-3073
Voted against bailout both times
Michael Burgess
1100 Circle Drive, Suite 200 Fort Worth, TX 76119
Ph: (817) 531-8454
Fax: 972) 434-9705
DC Ph: 202-225-7772
DC Fax: 202-225-2919
Voted against bailout both times
Solomon Ortiz
3649 Leopard, Suite 510 Corpus Christi, TX 78408
Ph: (361) 883-5868
Fax: (361) 884-9201
DC Ph: 202-225-7742
DC Fax: 202-226-1134
Turncoat: voted for bigger bailout
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Henry Cuellar
615 E. Houston Street, Suite 451 San Antonio, Texas 78205
Ph: (210)271-2851
Fax: (210) 277-6671
DC Ph: 202-225-1640
DC Fax: 202-225-1641
Turncoat: voted for bigger bailout
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Gene Green
256 N. Sam Houston Pkwy. E., Suite 29 Houston, TX 77060
Ph: (281) 999-5879
Fax: (281) 999-5716
DC Ph: 202-225-1688
DC Fax: 202-225-9903
Voted against bailout both times
Eddie Johnson
10701 Corporate Dr Suite #118 Stafford TX 77477
Ph: 281.240.3700
Fax: 281.240.2959
DC Ph: 202-225-8885
DC Fax: 202-226-1477
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
John Carter
One Financial Centre 1717 North IH 35 Suite 303 Round Rock, TX 78664
Ph: (512) 246-1600
DC Ph: 202-225-3864
DC Fax: 202-225-5886
Voted against bailout both times
Pete Sessions
Park Central VII 12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1434 Dallas, Texas 75251-1229
Ph: (972) 392-0505
Fax: (972) 392-0615
DC Ph: 202-225-2231
DC Fax: 202-225-5878
Voted for bailout both times
[Download handout]
[Download color handout] [Side 2]


John Cornyn (R) 517 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2934
Click to contact
Voted for bailout
[Download color handout] [Side 2]
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R) 284 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5922
Click to contact
Voted for bailout
[Download color handout] [Side 2]

Local profiles